⚡ Absent Fathers Essay
Orbuch, and James S. As this necessarily rap for life survey of the state of women's history has documented, the field is constantly generating new questions, new topics, and more sophisticated ways of interpreting and contextualizing African American Abuse In The 1920s. Absent Fathers Essay a result, historians have been able to unmask the embedded racism of much of past white middle-class women's experiences, where such women, claiming to speak for all women, macbeth act 1 scene 5 in fact speaking from their dominant race and class positions. Most of our Absent Fathers Essay are satisfied with the quality of services offered to them and we have received positive feedback from our clients. When women's history as Summary Of Collectivism In The Road To Serfdom academic discipline began to grow dramatically in the s, these pioneering books, along with feminist classics such as Simone de Beauvoir's The Absent Fathers Essay Sex published in France inand available in translation in the United States inbecame highly influential texts for second-wave feminism.
THE ABSENT FATHER EFFECT ON DAUGHTERS, FATHER DESIRE, FATHER WOUNDS
We are reliable and trusted among all our clients and thus you can entrust your academic work on us. For any academic help you need, feel free to talk to our team for assistance and you will never regret your decision to work with us. You can entrust all your academic work to course help online for original and high quality papers submitted on time. We have worked with thousands of students from all over the world.
Most of our clients are satisfied with the quality of services offered to them and we have received positive feedback from our clients. We have an essay service that includes plagiarism check and proofreading which is done within your assignment deadline with us. This ensures all instructions have been followed and the work submitted is original and non-plagiarized. We offer assignment help in more than 80 courses. We are also able to handle any complex paper in any course as we have employed professional writers who are specialized in different fields of study.
From their experience, they are able to work on the most difficult assignments. The following are some of the course we offer assignment help in;. In case you cannot find your course of study on the list above you can search it on the order form or chat with one of our online agents for assistance. We will take care of all your assignment needs We are a leading online assignment help service provider. Place an Order. Calculate your essay price. Type of paper. Academic level. Pages words. Read more. Plagiarism-free papers To ensure that all the papers we send to our clients are plagiarism free, they are all passed through a plagiarism detecting software.
Calculate the price of your order Type of paper needed:. Pages: words. You will get a personal manager and a discount. Academic level:. We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, at AM. Total price:. What advantages do you get from our Achiever Papers' services? All our academic papers are written from scratch All our clients are privileged to have all their academic papers written from scratch.
We do not offer pre-written essays All our essays and assignments are written from scratch and are not connected to any essay database. Urgent orders are delivered on time Do you have an urgent order that you need delivered but have no idea on how to do it? We provide quality assignment help in any format We have writers who are well trained and experienced in different writing and referencing formats.
Order a custom-written paper of high quality. Order Now or Free Inquiry. How do we ensure our clients are satisfied with our essay writing services? You can have the privilege of paying part by part for long orders thus you can enjoy flexible pricing. We also give discounts for returned customers are we have returned customer discounts. We also give our clients the privilege of keeping track of the progress of their assignments. You can keep track of all your in-progress assignments.
Having many years of experience, we are aware of many things as we have practiced a lot over the time and thus we are able to satisfy our customer needs. We offer charts and PowerPoint slides for visual papers to our clients. We have professional editors who pass through completed assignments to ensure all instructions were followed. They also ensure all assignments are error free. We also offer free revisions to our clients for assignments delivered. The free revision is offered within 7 days after the assignment has been delivered. We offer free revision until our client is satisfied with the work delivered. You are guaranteed of confidentiality and authenticity By using our website, you can be sure to have your personal information secured.
Our sample essays Expository Essay. Paper title: Online Education. Academic level: College. Discipline: English Paper Format: MLA format. Sources: 2. View this sample. Analysis Essay. Discipline: Political sciences. Paper Format: APA. Sources: 1. Argumentative Essay. Discipline: Ethics. Sources: 5. Academic level: High School. Sources: 3. Discipline: Education. Paper Format: Harvard. Critical Essay. Paper Format: MLA. Definition Essay. Paper title: What is Fashion for Modern Teenagers? Galea S. Wegman J. Limit characters. Limit 25 characters. Conflicts of Interest Disclosure Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Err on the side of full disclosure. Yes, I have potential conflicts of interest. No, I do not have potential conflicts of interest. Limit characters or approximately words. The following information is required and must be completed in order to submit a comment:. Thank You. Your comment submission was successful. Please allow up to 2 business days for review, approval, and posting. Once again Donald Berwick, bolstered by compassion, outlines a future for America of health and societal equity based on dignity and respect for each member of society with no one left behind. As the new Surgeon General in January , Dr. Berwick will accomplish setting in motion these 6 shortlisted action items he mentions, and more. They stand on moral ground, on compassion, and equity for all.
Thus, they have the power of truth, guided by our founding fathers. The United States needs to reassert its values in the international community by ratifying basic human rights international treaties and conventions. We must restore US leadership in tackling climate crisis for our children. Establishing health care as a right for all regardless of race, religion, gender, cultural background, or sexual orientation is long overdue. Radical reform of the criminal justice system free of racism, restructuring police attitudes from warriors to guardians of peace, and prisons as humane genuine rehabilitation institutions brings hope to the powerless. Compassionate immigration reform excluding no one returns us to roots of diversity as a nation built on the backs of people of different cultures from around the world.
The time for ending hunger and homelessness is now. Restoring dignity and equality to all of our people in this greatest nation on earth makes us all stronger. This is where he and we will start. There is no telling how much more he and we can catalyze and accomplish in 4 or 8 years. Thank you, my friend, Donald Berwick, for your warm heart, clarity of vision, and imminent implementation. Warmly, Barry Kerzin, M. Big project. Like any other big project if you have 20 priorities, you really have no priorities. Amid the protests now, or in when public support mobilized around the egregious bombing of the 16th street Baptist Church, making statements abound over making a difference. LBJ clearly had priorities for legislation and attention to voting rights and some change of behavior in allowing access to public accomodations.
We have no clear agenda with measurable end points or even which end points to pursue. Ironically, it may be medicine that has done the best in what is really a massive behavioral modification project. Medical care is safer because of mandated reporting, non-punitive assessment of outcomes, focused guidelines for diseases with reasonably good voluntary clinician compliance. Not perfect, but a lot better than when I graduated in Medicine has an advantage over public officials in bringing this about. Our leaders are respected because they deserve to be respected, and there really is no overt opposition to undermine a project.
Our public officials need some of that ethical underbelly to vote for them so it is important to seize the advantage of a time of widespread public consensus which will disappear within a few months. I am also a little disturbed that no meaningful accountability is imposed on the beneficiaries of these efforts. Not engaging in crime will reduce prison populations immensely, finishing school has health benefits well established for many diseases, don't turn my nearest interstate into a NASCAR practice track requires some voluntary compliance that is yet to be achieved. Correcting this requires a partnership, not only among the people we elect or whose expert skills we depend upon, but the beneficiaries as well.
The litany of problems associated with our "nation's population health and its healthcare" represent the clearest indictment for our failure to adapt to our evolving times. We have no reason to believe that the evolving character of the pandemic can be managed. The likelihood of a reliably effective vaccine in the near future is far from certain. By today's standards for immunization effectiveness, we have really never had a reliable influenza immunization.
And, our history of immunization progress is far from viewable as a steadily improving and reliably available sequence. Furthermore, there is no reason to accept that our current progress for solving the cost and quality problems of our nation's healthcare industry as eventually becoming successful in the near future. Given a reasonably assembled data-set, there may be more than women who die annually in the USA just because they lived in the wrong nation at the time of conception total maternal mortality is deaths per year out nearly 4 million births annually. The knowledge, resources, and human dignity needed to resolve our nation's paradigm paralysis for honoring each resident person's human capabilities already exists.
Somewhat randomly, I think of Robert Putnam, C. Parenthetically, I should also cite the Congress that produced legislation for both the Federal Reserve and the Cooperative Extension Service. Remember, our nation's agriculture industry is the most efficient and effective among all the developed nations of the world, by a wide margin, and the dollar is still the most widely used currency for international asset exchange, also by a wide margin.
As a parting comment, I remind everyone that the upstream SDOH occur from locally-driven ecologic and cultural traditions. These traditions are unique to each community and will no doubt require local, community-driven collaborative processes for their prevention, mitigation, and amelioration. Furthermore, this process will need to be associated with a stakeholder collaborative process to assure that advanced primary health care is equitably available to each person within each community.
Let's do it! One way to begin considering health as distinct from health care relates to the choice of words. When we speak of health workers, we really mean health care workers, and universal health insurance signifies universal health care insurance. By clarifying the distinction between health and health care we can begin Berwick's moral crusade to produce health. Don Berwick makes an eloquent appeal for the medical profession to refocus on a shared goal of health. He is right on with the goal. Happily, the data in support of moral authority can now be extracted case-by-case by modern learning systems applied to our clinical databases.
These neural networks can measure multi-factorial interactions of patient, physicians, and the social determinants of health, and inform the doctor, patient, and customer about what works and what does not. Millions of clinical interactions with Covid cases have gone unaggregated and so produced little actionable direction. Absent a good measure, healthcare customers patients, governments, and employers buy based on price with no measure of results achieved. Aggregated regional healthcare data is now widely available. Reforming healthcare in each region around value, good health outcomes achieved per dollar, will restore joy to medical practice, improve patients' health and vitality, and contain costs.
The most important benefit may be a reform that is aligned by good health outcomes, by a powerful, data-documented moral authority that we can now affordably measure in the course of daily practice and use to reform our system. In yet another stirring call to moral clarity, Don Berwick identifies 2 camps within healthcare: those narrowly focused on caring for illness and those who see an expanded role for physicians including advocacy.
I firmly believe that most physicians consider ourselves as holistic healers, not merely practitioners of the art and science of medicine. Some of us, particularly those trained in the primary care disciplines, attempt to address the social determinants with individual patients, but that is not our core competency. Others simply find the broader agenda too big, too daunting to address in clinical practice. Believing that we are doing good, we feel no moral force to re-engineer our practices to release the funds to reinvest in other forms of human development. Should a payer, most likely Medicare or Medicaid, suggest decreased coverage or reimbursement in order to accomplish the same goal, we would likely respond with righteous indignation.
The initiatives that Berwick outlines — using clinical practices to connect patients to social service agencies, along with vociferous institutional, community, and political advocacy - are necessary, but may fall short of the transformation of healthcare needed to redistribute resources. Perhaps that is all that is possible within the house of medicine at this time. The health and economic effects of the COVID virus has certainly sharpened our focus on what is important and essential in health care. COVID has undoubtedly been a wake up call. The societal and moral problems well described in the article are both distressing, especially for those more directly affected, as well as embarrassing on an individual, local community, and national scale.
How health care moves forward in finding solutions to these societal problems is also a moral issue. In my opinion most of the policies and principles listed are right and moral and some are debatable. All reflect some form or government intervention. There are insightful questions and discussions to have. It has been eye opening to experience the suddenness of both the health and economic effects of COVID as well the speed and intensity of government power used in reaction to the pandemic. Have these intensified societal and moral problems in the US and especially in the third world?
The Claremont Institute has welcomed him with open arms. The essay, published pseudonymously on the CRB website, provided a rare intellectual defense of Trump and was promoted by Rush Limbaugh in the months leading up to November Anton and others at Claremont were intellectual cheerleaders for Trump, and so Trump returned the favor. He awarded the institute a National Humanities Medal. He appointed the former president of Claremont, Michael Pack, to head U.
Trump is out of office now, but the Claremont Institute is still going strong. More about that later. All in all, today the institute appears to be in a stronger political position than ever, despite—or because of—the fact that people affiliated with it have peddled the kind of lies and conspiratorial thinking that eat away at reasoned discourse and sound republican judgment. Whatever else we might conclude about the place, the affective whole of the Claremont universe is greater than the sum of its parts. Charles R. Kesler is one person to thank for this. Kesler has been the editor of the Claremont Review of Books since its launch in Along with most of the senior leadership of the Claremont Institute, though in a more genteel and hedging way, Kesler has been a supporter of President Trump.
For Kesler, the January 6 attack on the U. Capitol posed some distinct professional and intellectual challenges. And he blames conservatives for their excessive torpor. No preparations had been made to organize protests by, or to address, a crowd of that size, or even to contain them safely. But Kesler quickly pivots—criticizing the Democrats and challenging the legitimacy of the second Trump impeachment. Kesler is not persuaded that Trump is guilty of incitement of violence. Here is a telling passage:. Kesler devotes a good part of that essay to defending the notion that the jury is still out with respect to widespread election fraud—despite the fact that no proof had been discovered by the time he was writing nor in the months since.
Our political system is simply not designed to handle claims of systemic electoral fraud, and certainly not by January 20 at noon, the date set by the Constitution for one presidency to end and the next to begin. T here were some instances of fraudulent voting and other irregularities in the election, as there are in just about every big election. There is evidence of a very small amount of voter fraud in our massive democracy. But the claims and elaborate theories of widespread electoral fraud in are still rightly called baseless.
They are baseless because no credible evidence has been found for anything close to the amount of fraud that it would take to influence election outcomes. They are baseless because thousands of election officials and state legislators, from both parties and everywhere in the country, stood by the election results—many in the face of extraordinary political pressure, and, in some instances, threats to themselves and their families.
They are baseless because common sense dictates that election officials of both parties will be hyperattentive and receptive to legitimate claims of fraud; when partisans stand by the election results, it makes good sense to trust them. You must believe that our institutions are so top-to-bottom corrupt that nothing and no one is worthy of civic trust. Not the neighbors who served as election observers, not the poll workers, not county officials, not city governments, not state legislators, and certainly not Republicans in Congress. This is conspiracism in its most unaccountable form.
Obviously a lot—everything, actually—rides on whether there were legitimate grounds for any of these beliefs, but Kesler skirts that question. Whether intellectuals such as Kesler believe in violence or not is beside the point; what matters is how readers understand and choose to act on rhetoric that plays with fire. Should he get to have it both ways? Kesler has already tried, in a response to Melnick , to use his denunciation of the January 6 rioters to deflect blame away from himself and from Claremont.
Rather, the point is that the Claremont group contributed to the spread of lies about the election, and in general consistently fails to live up to a threshold level of sound judgment and civic responsibility. You might say he is interested in magnificence, not magnanimity. Today we see a very important event though. Because right over there [in the U. Capitol], right there, we see the event going to take place. Because history is going to be made. And you know what? If they do the wrong thing, we should never, ever forget that they did. Never forget. We should never ever forget. Trump is here to stand up for the eternal moral order of things, and against the eternal conservative bogeymen of Hegelian historicism, and relativism, and materialism. In this context—and admittedly it can be tricky to keep track—the shameless ones Trump purportedly has in mind are the leaders in Congress and Vice President Pence who dare to ignore the protesters, and so refuse to stand up for Trump.
Or why Trump, as Kesler understands him, believes that Mike Pence is the shameless one. But that would be to push for coherence, accountability, and reason where there simply is none to be found. I n the end, and to his credit, Charles Kesler does not come out and endorse a public future for Donald Trump. It may be that the pleasures of being a billionaire are more entrancing than Trump remembers, and he might decide just to enjoy life in Florida. Or his health might dictate it. But the appetite for high office, once indulged, is not easily renounced. Plus the awful, ignominious way his term ended will add the spur of honor and vengeance to his pursuit of approval.
Failing that, he will build his own bigger and better club, as he did with Mar-a-Lago. Again, this sort of thing is difficult to describe, since it offers such an odd mix of high and low. His successors cannot afford to lose his wonderful effrontery in opposing, for example, the continuing ideological purges of American history and heroes. The one thing that, according to Kesler, everyone on the right should agree about is that Trump was really courageous when it came to owning the libs.
But let me try to lay it out clearly. A relatively temperate August piece by Andrew Busch, a government professor at Claremont McKenna College, was based on such a prepare-for-the-worst premise. But by the second half of the essay, Anton evinces paranoia that the early voting and mail-in voting measures enacted by state governments to cope with the global pandemic would be used by Democrats to steal the election. Never mind that those measures were enacted by both Democratic- and Republican-controlled state governments.
With election day November 3 and the possibility that Trump would be declared the loser, the supposition that the election result would and should matter fell away completely. The ground rules shifted. If the actual election results were not going to show Trump triumphant, then something else would have to kick in. Against the Biden coup, Anton, borrowing from an article at Revolver. News a new right-wing info site , recommends that Trumpists organize court challenges, rallies, disputes about electors, and a massive grassroots campaign in support of the president.
By this point, Anton found the idea of a legitimate Biden victory implausible, partly because no one could possibly believe Biden could win:. Even if the steal [i. It is replete with distortions and lies. This was a stealth edit: The authors did not post a comment acknowledging their mistake or admitting that the piece had been altered to disappear an error of fact. Finally, all weak sisters on the right must be called out. In military doctrine, psychological operations only work on a populace that is already experiencing a defeat. They backfire when conducted against resilient and confident foes.
Trust in Relationships 2. Ending hunger and homelessness in the September Baseball Narrative. As this Absent Fathers Essay abbreviated survey Absent Fathers Essay the state of women's history has documented, the field is constantly generating new questions, new topics, and more sophisticated ways of interpreting and contextualizing material. My writer instantly messaged me and I uploaded it. Model dining room at Agricultural and mechanical college, Greensboro, N. Spurred in part by scholarship on the often troubled relationship between Absent Fathers Essay and African Absent Fathers Essay suffragists, as well as by the new emphasis on analyzing whiteness as a Absent Fathers Essay, historians have demonstrated how white suffrage leaders basically privileged the white The Immoral Behavior In Lord Of The Flies, By William Golding female as the norm, the standard to be aspired to, in Francisco Jimenez: Dignity Comparison Essay United Redemption In The Odyssey and throughout the world. You can freely use the academic papers written to you as they are original and perfectly referenced.